THE
ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES IN THE RELATIVE CLAUSE WITH REFERENCE TO
STEINBECK’S THE PEARL
Author : - Putu Marlyn Ariesta
- English Department,
Faculty of Letters and Culture Udayana University 2014
Publisher : -
Page : -
Reviewed by : Mila Ida N
Research Question
1.
What is the the pattern
of the relative clause found in the novel “The Pearl” by John Steinback?
2.
How is the structure of
relative clause formulated in the novel “The Pearl” by John Steinbeck?
3.
What kind of the relative
clause found in the novel “The Pearl” by John Steinbeck?
<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-6570527672860531"
crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
This
journal’s purpose is to identify and find the structure patterns and the type
of relative clause which is found in the novel “The Pearl” written by Steinbeck
in 1947. The journal entitled “The Analysis of Syntactic Structures in The
Relative Clause with Reference to Steinbeck’s The Pearl” was
focused on the analysis of syntax in relation to the relative clause. Syntax is,
essentially, the way to analyze structure.
Methodology
The research method which is used in
this research is both qualitative and reconstructive methods. The author applied
the documentation research method to collect the data.
Findings
There are three patterns of relative
clauses that were found by the author in the novel “The Pearl” by Steinbeck (1947), which are:
1.
Relative clause = Relative pronoun or adverb +
subject + verb
For
example: His eyes went to the place where he had swept out the track. (Steinbeck, 1947: 42) The position of the relative clause is where he had swept out the track. The
relative adverb where was used to replace the word the place in
the second clause. He is the subject,
and had swept is the verb.
2.
Relative clause = Relative pronoun as a subject +
verb
For
example: Sometimes it rose to an aching chord that caught the throat.
(Steinbeck, 1947: 2). In this sentence the relative clause is that caught the throat, the relative
adverb that was used to replace the
word an aching chord in the second clause, where an aching chord is the subject, and caught is the verb.
3. Clause +
relative pronoun clause = relative clause
For example: The sun was quarter
high when
they were ready. (Steinbeck, 1947: 24).
When they were ready
is the relative clause, also there is the function as clause 1, that is, the sun (NP) was quarter high (VP), and as clause 2 is they (NP) were ready at a
quarter high sun (VP). Relative
Adverb when was used to replace the word quarter high in
the second clause.
The structure of a relative clause was
found by the author from this novel, “The best and happiest pearl buyer was he
[who he bought for the lowest prices].” (Steinbeck, 1947: 23) This example
consisted of two clauses, the main clause and relative clause. The clause who
bought for the lowest prices is
a relative clause, and the main clause is the best and happiest pearl buyer
was he. In this clause, it should be more clear as he is mentioned.
The tree diagram below can be adopted to provide a free relative clause in
which the antecedent vanishes (headless).
The
best and V NP S’
pearl
buyer was Pro Conj S’’
he who NP VP
Pro V PP
for
the lowest prices
Its
structure could be :
S àNP-VP
VP1 àV-NP2-S’
NP2 àPro
S’ àConj-S’’
S’’ àNP3-VP2
NP3 àPro
VP2 àV-PP
PP àP-NP
Three types of relative clauses has been
adopted by the author in accordance to Radford’s theory in 1988 :
1. Restrictive; defines the meaning of a
noun or noun phrase and provides necessary information about the noun in the
sentence.
For example:
a. The best and happiest pearl buyer was he
[who bought for the lowest
prices]. (Steinbeck, 1947: 23)
b. A country [where there was little game]
managed to live. (Steinbeck, 1947: 42)
2. Nonrestrictive; adds additional
information to a sentence.
For example:
a. The little tree frogs, [that lived near
the stream] twittered like birds. (Steinbeck, 1947: 48)
b. The birds, [which spent the day in the
brushland] came at night to the little pools. (Steinbeck, 1947: 45)
c. He lighted a candle and came to them,
[where they crouched in a corner]. (Steinbeck, 1947: 36)
3. Free; refers to the primary part of the
noun phrase which vanishes (headless), mainly in a surface structure (Radford,
1981: 358).
For example:
a. They would find it where Kino and Juana had rested. (Steinbeck, 1947: 43)
b. His hand strayed limply to the place where the pearl was hidden under his
clothes. (Steinbeck, 1947: 43)
Conclusion
A relative clause is a subordinate
clause that can modify a noun phrase, or generally a noun. It starts with a
relative pronoun, such as who, whom, whose, which, or that, and a relative
adverb, such as when, where, or why. Moreover, there are three patterns of
relative clauses that were found in the novel “The Pearl” by Steinbeck (1947)
as mentioned above. The journal has also shown the usefulness of applying
Radford’s 1988 theory when analyzing the types of clauses in sentences in order
to understand the meaning and the structure of that sentence.
Mohon jangan di copas tanpa izin, ya.
Mohon jangan di copas tanpa izin, ya.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar